What is Proactivity ?
While the word proactivity is now fairly common in management literature,
it is a word you won’t find in most
dictionaries. It means more than merely
taking initiative. It means that as human beings, we are responsible for our own lives. Our
behavior is a function of our decisions,
not our conditions. We can subordinate
feelings to values. We have the initiative and the responsibility to make things happen.
Look at the word responsibility—“response-ability”—the
ability to choose your response. Highly proactive
people recogn that responsibility. They
do not blame circumstances, conditions, or conditioning for their behavior. Their behavior
is a product of their own conscious choice, based on values, rather than a product of their conditions, based on feeling.
Because we are, by
nature, proactive, if our lives are a
function of conditioning and conditions, it
is because we have, by conscious decision or
by default, chosen to empower those things
to control us.
In making such a
choice, we become reactive. Reactive
people are often affected by their physical environment. If the weather is good, they feel good. If it isn’t, it
affects their attitude and their performance. Proactive
people can carry their own weather with
them. Whether it rains or shines makes no difference to them. They are value driven; and if their
value is to produce good quality work, it isn’t a function of whether
the weather is conducive to it or not.
Reactive people are
also affected by their social environment, by the
“social weather.” When people treat them well,
they feel well; when people don’t, they become defensive or
protective. Reactive people build their emotional lives around the behavior of others, empowering the weaknesses of other people to
control them.
The ability to subordinate an impulse to a value is the essence of the proactive person.
Reactive people are driven by feelings, by circumstances, by conditions, by their environment. Proactive people are
driven by values—carefully thought about, selected and internalized values.
Proactive people are
still influenced by external stimuli, whether physical,
social, or psychological. But their response to the stimuli, conscious
or unconscious, is a value-based choice or
response.
As Eleanor Roosevelt observed, “No one can hurt you without your consent.” In the
words of Gandhi, “They cannot take away our self respect if we do not
give it to them.” It is our willing permission, our consent to what happens to us,
that hurts us far more than what happens to us in the
first place.
I admit this is very hard to accept emotionally, especially if we have had years and years of explaining our misery in
the name of circumstance or someone else’s behavior. But until a person can say deeply and honestly, “I am what I am today because of the choices made yesterday,” that
person cannot say, “I choose otherwise.”
Once in
Sacramento when I was speaking on the
subject of proactivity, a woman
in the audience stood up in the
middle of my presentation and
started talking excitedly. It was a large audience, and as a number of people
turned to look at her, she suddenly became
aware of what she was doing, grew
embarrassed and sat back down.
But she seemed to find it difficult to restrain herself and started talking to the people around her. She seemed so happy.
I could hardly wait for a break to find out what had happened. When it finally came, I immediately went to her
and asked if she would be willing to share her
experience.
“You just can’t imagine what’s happened to me!” she exclaimed. “I’m a
full time nurse to the most miserable, ungrateful man you can possibly imagine. Nothing I do is good enough for him. He never expresses appreciation; he hardly even acknowledges me. He constantly
harps at me and finds fault with
everything I do. This man has
made my life miserable and I often take
my frustration out on my family. The other nurses feel the
same way. We almost pray for his demise.
“And for you to have the gall to stand up there and suggest that nothing can hurt me, that no one can hurt me without my
consent, and that I have chosen my own emotional life of being miserable—well, there was
just no way I could buy into that.
“But I kept thinking about it. I really went inside myself and began to ask, ‘Do I have the power to choose my response?’
“When I finally realized that I do have that power, when I swallowed that
bitter pill and realized that I had chosen to be miserable, I also
realized that I could choose not to be miserable.
“At that moment I
stood up. I felt as though I was being let out of San
Quentin. I wanted to yell to the
whole world, ‘I am free! I am let out of
prison! No longer am I going to
be controlled by the treatment of some person.’”
It’s not what happens to us, but our response
to what happens
to us that
hurts us. Of course, things can hurt us physically
or economically and can cause sorrow. But
our character, our basic identity, does not have to
be hurt at all. In fact, our most difficult experiences become the crucibles that forge our character and
develop the internal powers, the
freedom to handle difficult circumstances in the
future and to inspire others to do so as well.
Frankl is one of many
who have been able to
develop the personal freedom in
difficult circumstances to lift and inspire others. The autobiographical accounts
of Vietnam
prisoners of war provide additional persuasive testimony of the
transforming power of such personal freedom and the effect of the responsible use of that freedom on the prison culture and on the prisoners, both then and now.
We have all known
individuals in very difficult
circumstances, perhaps with a terminal illness or a severe physical handicap, who maintain magnificent emotional strength. How
inspired we are by their integrity! Nothing has a greater, longer lasting impression upon another person than the
awareness that someone has transcended suffering, has transcended
circumstance, and is embodying and expressing a value that
inspires and ennobles and lifts life.
One of the most inspiring times Sandra and
I have ever had took place over a four-year period with a dear friend of ours named Carol, who had a wasting cancer disease. She
had been one of Sandra’s bridesmaids, and
they had been best friends for over 25
years.
When Carol was in
the very last stages of the disease, Sandra spent time at
her bedside helping her write her personal history. She returned from those
protracted and difficult sessions almost transfixed by admiration for her friend’s courage and her desire to write special messages to be given to her children
at different stages in their lives.
Carol would take as little pain-killing medication as possible, so that she had full access to her mental and emotional faculties. Then she would
whisper into a tape recorder or to Sandra directly as she took notes. Carol was so proactive, so brave, and so concerned about others that she became an
enormous source of inspiration to many people
around her.
I’ll never forget the experience of looking deeply into Carol’s eyes the day before she passed away and sensing out of that deep hollowed agony a person of tremendous intrinsic worth. I could see
in her eyes a life of character,
contribution, and service as well as love and concern and appreciation.
Many times over the
years, I have asked groups of people how many have ever
experienced being in the presence of a dying individual who had a magnificent attitude and communicated love and compassion and served in unmatchable ways to the very
end. Usually, about one-fourth of the audience responds in the
affirmative. I then ask how many of them
will never forget
these individuals— how many were transformed, at least
temporarily, by the inspiration of such courage, and were deeply moved and
motivated to more noble acts of service and compassion. The same people respond
again, almost inevitably.
Someone suggests that there are three central values in life—the experiential, or that which happens to us; the creative, or that which we bring into existence; and the attitudinal, or our response in difficult circumstances
such as terminal illness.
My own experience with people confirms the point Frankl makes—that the highest of the three values is attitudinal, in the
paradigm or reframing sense. In other words, what matters most is how we respond to what we
experience in life.
Difficult circumstances
often create paradigm shifts, whole new frames
of reference by which people see the
world and themselves and others in it, and what life is asking of them. Their larger perspective reflects the attitudinal
values that lift and inspire us all.



No comments:
Post a Comment